Category Archives: Letter

LETTER- Menu: Anyone Care For A Tortured Duck ?

Dear Editor

Unlike vegetarian converts, I’ve never had a crisis of conscience about eating meat, provided it’s sourced from animals who’ve been treated with respect and slaughtered humanely. A prime example would be livestock reared on a Hebridean holding by a caring crofter who knows his stock individually.foiegras4r

This is most certainly not the case for ducks, geese and other unfortunate wildfowl imprisoned in tiny cages where, through a tube inserted down their gullet, they are force-fed nutrients that artificially enlarge their livers to grotesque proportions to provide the culinary delicacy known as foie gras. We can only imagine their sheer torment, and weep for those sociable animals whose natural inclination is to preen, graze and fly freely in the great outdoors.

This practice amounts to the prolonged torturing of helpless animals solely for the gastronomic kicks of wealthy patrons who frequent upmarket eateries. Anyone who enjoys this delicacy, aware of the pain and suffering endured to put it onto their plate, is quite simply a salivating sadist indulging in the dining equivalent of badger-baiting.

Though by no means the only culprit, one of the best known beneficiaries of selling foie gras to the well-heeled diners of his international restaurant chain is celebrity TV chef Gordon Ramsey of The F Word fame.

May I suggest that for Ramsey’s next TV appearance there should be a surprise departure from the usual recipe, turning the dining tables and The F Word on the celebrity chef. The BBC make-up department should attach to Ramsey’s real foul mouth Orville the Duck’s prosthetic fowl mouth through which pulverised horsemeat (available from selected supermarkets) is force-fed until, choking on his own vomit, he pleadingly ‘quacks’ for mercy. His pleas are ignored and the process is continually repeated until he’s writhing agonisingly in his own filth. This is what the BBC would describe as a real-life reconstruction.

This drastic departure from F Word normality should shock viewers out of their culinary comfort zone and traumatise Ramsey’s and other dining establishments’ clientele into a sudden loss of appetite for foie gras. If not, they’ll rightly be regarded by all humane people as the drooling, sadistic accomplices of restaurateurs profiteering from a barbaric form of animal torture.

Faithfully, etc

Iain M Macdonald
Miavaig

Cigarettes and whisky

Dear Editor

We live in strange and troubling times, nowhere more so than in our subsidised Western Isles council canteen where SNP councillors avoid the main course prime cuts by going straight to the dessert to indulge in their favourite pastime of ‘deserting’.

Meanwhile, fresh from a hearty prime sirloin steak lunch, our council convener gravely informs us that wholesome home-cooked meals presently fed to many elderly and vulnerable island residents will be replaced by a cheap down-market menu of processed meats that have as likely been sliced from the carcase of a past runner in the 2.45 at Newmarket as from a healthy heifer reared on croftland in the Lewis village of that same name.

The convener tells us these economies have been forced on the Comhairle due to spending cuts imposed on the Council by the SNP-led Holyrood Government, who in turn tell us they had to cut the Western Isles council budget due to financial constraints enforced by the Tory/LibDem UK Government.

Could this be the same ‘cash strapped’ Scottish Government who only a few short weeks ago opened their coffers to give a £1.9 million financial handout disguised as a grant to a group of wealthy investors planning to build a gin/whisky distillery on the Isle of Harris?

How very typical of modern day Scotland,where those at the back of the queue already too demoralised to complain are offered an unwholesome goulash of dubious pedigree,while the more affluent and well-connected are served a roasted golden goose stuffed with public money (remember the bankers!) ,washed down by a free round of treble whiskies on the Holyrood house.

Personally, I’ve never been mesmerised by the myths surrounding Scotch whisky. Stripped of its false romanticism, the modern day Scottish drinks industry is no more than a multinational supplier of mass produced alcoholic beverages. There are of course honourable exceptions such as the small-scale Abhainn Dearg distillery

For reasons shortly to become apparent, I now digress from alcohol to that other widely available socially acceptable drug: nicotine. Like many of my generation, no hedonistic youthful soiree was complete without both stimulants. Whilst sipping a glass of Famous Grouse, I inhaled the nicotine through a generously filled roll-up of finest Golden Virginia tobacco. Some of my more sophisticated fellow smokers chose brand name filter tips, while my more wayward companions had more exotic tastes in their choice of weed.

Possibly due to some psychological or genetic quirk.I developed an abnormally high sensitivity to the aromas given off by the various tobacco flavours. Once I’d identified the brand name, it was retained in my memory for instant retrieval.

Prior to the smoking ban, the Stornoway harbour hostelries of my youth offered a heady mix of international aromas. Without leaving the saloon bar, I could tell if there was a foreign ship in port and even locate its home country simply by sniffing the air for unusual tobacco aromas. French, Spanish, Scandinavian and Eastern Bloc crewmen all smoked their own distinctive brands which I could instantly identify.

My 15-year relationship with nicotine turned sour as it gradually dawned that I’d become an obedient servant on call 24/7 to a demanding and tyrannical master from whom I eventually struggled free a number of years ago. Many other people find themselves in a similar servant/master relationship with Scotch whisky and other alcoholic beverages.

There are other similarities between alcoholic drinks and carcinogenic (cancer causing ) cigarettes; both products can be highly addictive with undesirable side-effects which can exact a high price from their users and immediate family. The human and financial cost of smoking and alcohol-related ailments in Scotland, including the Western Isles, is truly shocking. Smokers and drinkers are also penalised by governments who treat them as a collective cash cow from which to milk tax revenues.

This particular cow eventually kicked the milk-bucket away but paradoxically since stopping smoking my sense of smell has so improved that I’ve developed a hypersensitivity to tobacco flavours and still retain a fondness for the sweet aroma of slow-burning Golden Virginia, the merest hint of which I can detect in the air over great distances. Although now a non-smoker, I still retain the ability to identify any international brand name of cigarette after the briefest exposure to its distinctive aroma. This is a specialist expertise which I thought was of little value…… until now.

Given that alcohol and tobacco are inextricably linked,what could more perfectly compliment a Harris produced whisky than a Lewis manufactured cigarette?

My own unusual natural aptitude and accumulated expertise in this area would be invaluable in producing a special cigarette blend unique to Lewis, which would turn my home island into a destination on the tobacco trail of discerning smokers worldwide. I already have exciting plans for adding local ingredients to the imported tobacco leaves

Obviously, I would need access to Scottish Government financial grants to maintain a comfortable lifestyle while conducting the extensive time-consuming research and testing of the product prior to bringing it to market, and therein lies the problem.

Coming from an uncultured Uigeach, such a request for financial assistance would be given short shrift. But coming from the mouth of a well connected person of refined accent, my proposal may be looked on more favourably by those entrusted with dispensing public money to worthy causes. I am now looking for a business partner who fits the bill. Anyone interested?

Everyone will be greatly relieved to learn that I won’t be raiding the public purse in my quest to become an island tobacco baron because this proposed business venture is proceeding no further than my imagination.

But before laying the proposal to rest, a final question for those who’ve followed the reasoning behind this letter. What in principle would be the moral difference between me and my hypothetical business associate pocketing £1.9 million of public money to establish a carcinogenic cigarette-making factory in Lewis or pocketing a similar amount to site a gin/whisky distillery in Harris?

Yours faithfully

 
Iain M Macdonald
Miavaig

PS – I wrote the above letter in the hope of having it published through the mainstream local media believing the topics raised might be of interest to a wider readership. But once more my freedom of speech has been curtailed for unexplained reasons by those who think themselves so superior that they don’t even have to give a reason.
Being denied non-abusive free speech should not be taken lying down, given the sacrifices made by previous generations so that we might exercise that privilege. So, instead of climbing onto a soapbox to lecture about the evils of bullying others into submission by removing their legitimate free speech, a more practical example of the adverse consequences on each individual can best be illustrated by withdrawing their right of reply to the above letter.

Plane Sailing – but no trains?

Kyles Flodda
Isle of Benbecula

Dear Editor

Yes, boats and planes are controversial topics of conversation in the most recent round of cuts to public services here in the Western Isles, and there is nothing plain or straightforward about the shenanigans and neat footwork now being witnessed. There is genuine anxiety in the southern isles.

The Comhairle claim that NHS Western Isles take up about 30% of seats on the air services now under threat of closure, or reduced service, on the Barra/Benbecula/Stornoway routes. The subsidy carried wholly by the Comhairle is about £630,000 pa. Our MSP has written to the respective Chief Executives of the Comhairle and NHS, concerned in particular about the impact on patient services and accessing planned hospital appointments (especially from Barra).

Barra patients and GP’s are more likely to favour the single and more convenient journey to Glasgow on one plane journey, rather than two often disruptive ferry crossings and long overland distance to Stornoway. This may prove to be more costly to the NHS.

Andrew Walker

        Andrew Walker

NHS Western Isles are undertaking their own appraisal of proposed changes, to report on the day the Full Council makes its decision on substantive cuts (82 options presently under consideration), on 14th February – colloquially being referred to as the St Valentine’s Day Massacre! An additional near £5m of cuts, on top of £10m of cuts already implemented in two previous years.The Scottish Government are overly optimistic, and are reported to have said, rather naively: “The Scottish Government is aware of the ongoing discussions between NHS Western Isles and the local authority and expects that the situation will be resolved between the two organisations.”   (Hebrides News, 28th Jan)

Too bad we don’t have trains! Yes, as taxpayers to the UK Treasury, our good citizens will be contributing towards the generous subsidy of 8.1p per passenger mile being paid by the UK government to the various rail franchise holders on the mainland.

Resolving this unfortunate local difficulty being faced by our life-line inter-island air services demands an urgent meeting with the Scottish Government Cabinet Secretaries for (i) Finance, (ii) Transport and (iii) Health and Social Care. Our MSP is best placed to organise such a meeting. RET for ferry services to our islands is subsidised by central government (also soon to include inter-island ferries too), so why not our vulnerable air services?

What is the difference, and why should the Comhairle alone be saddled with this hefty subsidy cost? Many other public service agencies, and quangos (eg SNH, SEPA, HIE) in addition to NHS and the Comhairle use these air services on a regular basis. They are in essence life-line services, and ferry travel is often not an option.

The SNP government and local representatives are presently out of favour here in the islands, for a number of controversial and disadvantageous decisions recently made – including an inflation-busting increase in ferry fares from April this year. They need to redeem themselves. This proposed solution, i.e. assume responsibility for this subsidy for this vital inter-island air service, on a five day per week basis, is surely within their powers?

Yours sincerely

Andrew Walker

LETTER – an “embarrassingly-flawed” report on RET

The usual SNP drivel and nonsense is being repeated in the hope that if they say it often enough, in a soft enough voice, people will believe it. With the dismantling of RET, the SNP are repeatedly quoting an embarrassingly-flawed report from their ‘specialist advisers’, which they spent our money on, to tell the SNP exactly what the SNP wanted to hear.

They are trying to use this report to dodge and justify the fact that they promised a vote for the SNP was ‘a vote to save RET’. They lied. Calling good people of these islands – like the owners of MacAskill Haulage (now bankrupt), Woody’s, Hebridean Haulage, Buchanan’s, and all the other businesses who employ them to transport our goods, “liars and cheats” does not change the fact that the SNP lied. The SNP activists and councillors of these islands, who on the doorsteps told us all that a vote for the SNP was a vote to save RET now have to let us all know whether they were lied to by their party and their MSP, and therefore made fools of – like the rest of us.

Or were they part of the lie? Their presence, or lack of it, on the protest this Saturday will probably answer that question for us. When the SNP want a certain message generated they employ a ‘specialist adviser’. The Halcrow report is calling our island businessmen, effectively, liars and cheats. Let’s look at the SNP’s history with ‘specialist advisers’ telling them what they want to hear, shall we?

The economy 1999 – 2005 or so = Goodwin et al from the RBS

Paraphrasing of course; “Scotlands economy is one of the strongest with the strongest and most respected banks in the world, such as RBS, so of course an Independent Salmondland, whoops, I mean Scotland, would be financially independent, far richer and even those on benefits and the minimum wage will be £10 a week better off, just the same as Mr Souter will be £10 per week better off. Further, an independent Salmondland could expect to enjoy as vibrant and expanding economy as Iceland, Ireland or Greece”.

2010 Mr Al Megrahi, = “The medical specialist dealing with his illness”

Paraphrasing again; “The medical specialist looking after Mr Magrahi informs us that the very expensive plan to accommodate his family during his terminal illness with all the expensive and awkward difficulties of security and protection that their presence in Salmondland would involve is now unnecessary. Mr Megrahi is not expected to live beyond three months.” On that specialist information, Mr S and Mr Mac decided the right thing to do was to send him home to the safety and comfort of his homeland, Libya, instead. But, of course, under Scots law, they could not do this if Mr Megrahi continued to protest his innocence and wished to proceed and continue with his (very expensive and awkward) appeal against his conviction.”

The medical specialist in question? Was it his Urologist or his Oncologist, who between them had decades of experience and up-to-date knowledge of prostate cancer, which type of cancer Mr Megrahi had and still has, current treatments and all those available and his likely progression and prognosis? No! These specialists are quoted and reported as having been rather surprised and alarmed when they heard the announcement of Mr Megrahi’s imminent release and death, wondering what on earth else had happened to Mr Megrahi to so severely alter his life expectancy. They were certain that they had communicated to the prison medical authority a much more positive prognosis regarding his prostate cancer.

The medical expert in question that the SNP employed would appear to be the prison GP. Now, a prison GP is a specialist of sorts. They tend to become specialist in addictions, such as gambling, alcohol, drugs, compulsive lying, and other self destructive behaviors or damaging behaviours. Prison GPs also become specialists in psychiatric conditions such as delusions, depression, sociopaths and megalomania and, of course, they also become specialists in minor trauma or infections caused by such things as thuggery, buggery and fellatio. I can well understand why the SNP elite might want or need a prison GP’s expert opinion but an expert on prostate cancer, its treatments and prognosis he was not.

So, all those SNP bloggers and activists out there that seem to be insisting that the specialist advice from the English firm employed to tell Mr Salmond and Mr Allan what they wanted to hear are asking us to believe them rather than the good standing and respected people of these islands who try to provide jobs, while healthily providing a competitive service to these islands, so competitive that one large operator has recently gone bust).

Calling good businessmen of these islands “liars and cheats” when the people of these islands know and respect these businessmen and basing this claim on “specialist advice” chosen by the SNP is not only insulting the good businessmen of these islands but insulting the people of these islands as well. I call again on the grassroots SNP of these islands to let us know whether they were lied to, like we were, or whether they were lying to us as well, by them either supporting the protest on Saturday, or not, respectively.

Dr Iain Macphail
Goathill Road
Stornoway