Category Archives: politics

SNP youth to launch independence tour in Stornoway

The SNP youth wing is to launch its independence Question and Answer tour in Stornoway kicking off a national tour of Scotland.

Over the coming months Young Scots for Independence (YSI) will tour the country, hosting public meetings and talking about independence and how it will shape the future of Scotland.

A public meeting in Stornoway’’s Bridge Community Centre on 19th December at 7pm will be led by YSI National Convener David Linden and local MSP Alasdair Allan.

David Linden said: “”I am looking forward to coming up to the Isle of Lewis and talking about our positive vision for an independent Scotland. This isn’’t just a box ticking exercise, it’’s a genuine open invitation to all islanders –- young and old – to come along and discuss the future of Scotland and the forthcoming referendum.
““There is no doubt that, since the SNP’s landslide election victory, people are thinking more about the future of our country and what the new Scotland will look like.”

“Almost all the political parties, says the SNP announcement, have conceded that a change is on the horizon, be it devolution max or independence, so they are embarking on a national tour, making their pitch as well as answering questions.

Alasdair Allan said: ““This event is one of many around the country that seeks to kick off the independence referendum campaign, and highlights the crucial role of Scotland’s young people in deciding a question that will affect them more than most Scotland’s future.
““In the 20 years since I was first chapping on doors for the SNP, the argument for independence has come a huge distance, with the re-establishment of Scotland’s parliament, an SNP Government, an SNP majority and now a referendum on independence itself.
““The case for Scotland now to take responsibility for our own taxes, make decisions about our own pensions and represent ourselves in the world is immensely positive, and appeals well beyond the normal run of party politics. I welcome this event in Stornoway, which serves to underline the strong support among young people in the islands for real power to
come to Scotland.””

The SNP launches its bold plan with which it will go all out to grab total control of Western Isles Council

The SNP has announced a raft of hopefuls who will stand at the Western Isles council elections in May 2012 in a bold move which signals the long-expected plan to grab control of the authority.

For the first time the nationalists are fielding candidates in all nine enlarged wards, with a total of 16 candidates. They will be officially introduced to SNP members at a St Andrews Evening  tonight (Friday).

The SNP’s candidates will be:

Ward 1 – Barra, Vatersay, Eriskay and South Uist – Cllr. Donald Manford
Ward 1 – Barra, Vatersay, Eriskay and South Uist – Cllr. Gerry MacLeod
Ward 1 – Barra, Vatersay, Eriskay and South Uist – Willie Douglas
Ward 2 – Benbecula and North Uist – Bryan Macpherson
Ward 2 – Benbecula and North Uist– Andrew Walker
Ward 3 – Harris and South Lochs – Cllr Philip Mclean
Ward 4 – Uig and North Lochs – Cllr Annie MacDonald
Ward 4 – Uig and North Lochs – Bill Houston
Ward 5 – Point – John Norman ‘Orica’ MacDonald
Ward 5 – Point – Iain Don MacIver
Ward 6 – Stornoway South – Mohammed Ahmed
Ward 6 – Stornoway South – Gordon Murray
Ward 7 – Stornoway North – Bob Duncan
Ward 7 – Stornoway North – Rae MacKenzie
Ward 8 – Broad Bay – Cllr John A MacIver
Ward 9 – West Side and Ness – Kenny MacLeod

The Labour Party, meanwhile, is in turmoil since the last Holyrood election. Its candidate was a Free Church elder who famously confirmed his support for the right of accomodation providers to discriminate against paying guests who fail to engage in Free Church-approved sexual practices.

He failed to get the backing of even hardline church members so is now expected to stand for council on the basis that there may be more rabid homophobes per square mile in Point compared to all of the islands.

The SNP knows it could now be in line for a historic takeover. Alasdair Allan, MSP for Na h-Eileanan an Iar, confirmed the SNP was putting up more than three times as many council candidates in the Western Isles than they ever did before.

“We do this because there is a clear demand for a new council with fresh ideas, one which will work hard in the interests of jobs and services in the islands during tough economic times.
“I intend to get round as many doorsteps as I can with our council candidates between now and May to listen to and respond to people’s views and concerns, and I know we have selected a team which can make a real breakthrough for the SNP in the islands.”

Angus MacNeil, the islands’ SNP MP, added: “We will fight a positive campaign and one which draws on the depth of support which now exists for the SNP in the islands. The SNP’s candidates are serious about taking local responsibility in communities from Ness to Vatersay.
“The SNP in the islands is clearly energised, not just by our success nationally, but by the trust which the party has earned within the community. Today’s announcement of 16 council candidates marks the arrival of the SNP as a decisive force within local politics in the Western Isles.”

Council group leader Donald Manford said the SNP were sending out a clear signal that they intend to dramatically increase their representation on the Comhairle from the current group of four councillors.

Johann Lamont has now set out her unequivocal stance on equality – but she won’t answer questions about those embarrassing Western Isles bigots

I’ve had a difficult conversation or two recently with certain Labour figures who want me to stop pointing out the extremist tendencies of some of their seemingly-loyal people. Branch chairman Matt Bruce wrote having a go too telling me, more or less, to change my sources. Everything is sweetness and light and no churchy bigot is calling the shots. He’s in charge.

OK, he didn’t use those exact words but that’s the gist. Inexplicably, Matt completely forgot to explain what he was doing about the bigots among his members whose vile and hateful views have so  badly tarnished the once-thriving party.

Lamont - after being unanimously endorsed by the Hebridean Haters Party, why is she now unwilling to discuss equality issues?

He also took issue with me for calling him names. How dare I call him “decent”. Sorry Matt, but after realising you have no intention of taking any action to drive out the nutcases who would attack some of the most vulnerable in society, I won’t make that mistake again.

Just to cheer him up, below is a lovely wee letter from Johann Lamont to Alex Salmond a few months ago to remind everyone where Labour stands on equality. This is from the woman endorsed by Crichton and Macleod and the entire local branch as their next leader. Yes, not-so-decent Matt proudly announced it was “unanimous”.

Amazingly, Ms Lamont fails to declare her support for Mr Donald Crichton’s bold call for a Heterosexuality Test before couples are allowed to book accommodation or Mr John Macleod’s personal assessment, presumably after extensive research, that anyone not displaying rippling heterosexual prowess like himself should be put down.

Either the extremist elder and the crackpot columnist – part of the famously “unanimous” vote  - have dramatically changed their views on gay rights, in which case we should be told and I will immediately withdraw everything I have said, or they believe Ms Lamont is just a hypocrite looking for votes who will not actually do anything to push equality.

Last week I wrote to Ms Lamont pointing out the public proclamations of the Hebridean bigots. I asked her for a chat on radio about equality along the lines of what she wrote below to Alex Salmond.  She has neither replied nor even bothered to acknowledge my inquiry. We are all entitled to wonder why.

- – - – - – - – -

5 August 2011

Dear Alex

I write to you regarding the comments of one of your SNP colleagues regarding same-sex marriage.

In Scottish Parliament motion S4M-00586 John Mason claims that individuals and organisations would somehow be “forced to be involved in or to approve of” same-sex marriages. I trust you will agree this is a fundamental misunderstanding of the whole debate around same-sex marriage. The debate is not about forcing anything on anybody – it is about allowing religious organisations that wish it the freedom to hold same-sex ceremonies in their buildings.

As the Equality and Human Rights Commission have reported there has been growing public support of same-sex relationships in the last two decades with the Scottish and British Social Attitudes Surveys showing a substantial increase in those who feel same-sex relationships are “rarely/never wrong” as well as growing support for same-sex couples to be allowed to marry. Some recent opinion polls have suggested that support for same-sex marriage to be as high as 58%. With the majority of Scots agreeing that same sex couples should be afforded the same right to get married as heterosexual couples, Mr Mason’s views are out of kilter with mainstream Scottish opinion.

Mr Mason has so far failed to explain whether his comments were in fact a coded attack on the rights of gay people and indeed whether he speaks for the SNP. I note also that the motion has secured the backing of a number of other SNP MSPs. However, I note that Pete Wishart MP has criticised Mr Mason’s motion as “nasty”, “anti-gay”, “wrong” and that he was “really disappointed that other colleagues have signed it.” I therefore wanted to write to you to seek your assurances that Mr Mason’s comments do not reflect the views of the SNP or the Scottish government and urge you publicly to make clear your personal position and that of your party.

Labour is proud to have introduced civil partnerships – an important step forward in tackling inequality. We believe the time is now right to consult on options to provide genuine equality for same-sex couples and their families by addressing the different status of civil partnerships and marriage. I note the SNP manifesto committed to “begin a process of consultation and discussion on these issues.” I would be grateful if you could outline the scope of the consultation and indicate when it will be launched. In particular, I would ask whether the consultation will consider the best way to implement the ‘Alli Amendment’ in Scotland to give religious organisations which wish it the freedom to hold civil partnerships in their buildings for the first time.

Labour is clear – Scotland absolutely should not be left behind on issues of gay equality and I hope the Scottish government agrees.

I look forward to your response.

Yours sincerely

Johann Lamont MSP
Deputy Scottish Labour Leader

Muslim MP silenced by Free Church bigots. You couldn’t really make this one up.

The call from Anas Sarwar’s assistant on Monday was friendly. The candidate for the Scottish Labour deputy leadership, recently backed by the Western Isles local party, was coming to Stornoway and wondered if I wanted a chat. Yes please, I said, because I would like to do a radio interview. We arranged to meet on Wednesday afternoon.

When I told certain political chatterers that I planned to interview the MP, they were pleased. Good man, they said. He will deal with whatever you pitch at him. I’m looking forward to this, I said.

Having promised several sickened members of Labour’s former faithful to expose the evil gay-hater John Macleod’s wretched involvement in the local party, I did so on the blog on Monday night. It’d give me something else to talk to Sarwar about because, like many of his party’s acolytes, he has spoken out firmly against extremism himself.

When the chatterers saw what I had written – well, thousands have read it – and how vicious Macleod had been over the years, they baulked. They had forgotten how hateful and deranged this cracked lunatic really was. What the hell was the local party doing even giving the time of day to such a toxic individual? they gasped. It’s a good question which one day will be answered, I promise you.

One chatterer was doubtful and said: “If Sarwar still speaks to you knowing you will have the homophobia that has infected the local association on the agenda, then he really is leadership material.” Hey, I’d got a dozen questions and that is just one of them. There was a lot of other things I wanted to ask too.

When the chatterer – he’s really my well-placed political adviser – phoned back Wednesday lunchtime, he wondered if Sarwar had cancelled. Nope, it’s still on for 4.30pm, I told him. “This guy could be the next PM. Not joking,” he said.

However, at about 3.15pm, Sarwar’s assistant called to say the interview was off. What? Oh, he’s really busy and things had regrettably been “pushed back”. I could email in some questions, she said. Oh, that’ll make fantastic radio, I said. We will just get his answers up on the computer screen and broadcast 10 minutes of silence.

“Sorry, bye.” Bye yourself, I thought.

Ten minutes later she was back on the phone trying to arrange a telephone interview. Ah, someone (can’t think who) has been dripping poison in his ear but Sarwar still wants to speak. Excellent. This must be good guy, after all. Why, I wondered, if he was able to do a phone interview at 4.30pm, could we not just meet so I could interview him face-to-face? I prefer to see the whites of their eyes, you see.

Still, a phone interview about the religious extremism strangling the Western Isles Labour Party with a Labour guy who has condemned all religious extremism and who will probably be the next deputy leader would be fantastic.

He never called back, I am saddened to tell you. As of this morning, I now know for certain who advised him not to.

Instead of standing up for the wee people and for their rights as he promised before he stood as a candidate, Anas Sarwar listened instead to a few well-heeled bigots and shattered his promise – and his reputation with many.

I have had messages from politicians up and down the country in response to that previous blog posting. They are fascinated that bigots can wield such power. It’s not news to us in the islands. They also note with interest that the local media here are all, as ever, scared witless to write a single word about the unholy mess into which two vicious individuals – it was three, but the third is coming to his senses – have plunged local Labour.

Now we have to wait and see if the person who really matters, Johann Lamont, is as happy to talk about the evils of religious prejudice and minority bashing in her own party as she was to make these promises before a bunch of compliant big city journos. I have, of course, written to ask her exactly that.

PS: I was asked today by a prominent politician how local Labour chairman Matt Bruce, who everyone thought was a decent fellow, can possibly allow religious right-wingers, who are vicious campaigners against Labour’s equality agenda to call the shots at a Labour Party branch. Who knows? I hope somebody will ask him soon.

Ye’ll ken them by the company they keep

I hope deputy Labour leadership contender Anas Sarwar, a man who once upon a time brusqely claimed there was no place in Scottish politics for religious extremism, enjoyed his meeting in Stornoway tonight.  Interestingly, earlier in the day, Mr Sarwar decided he preferred the company of a bloodthirsty, bigoted homophobe from the Daily Mail masquerading as a supporter of the workers’ party to mine.  His decision, which some people will not forget.
I’m sure Mr S  had a good time despite the stench from the company he was in.  It was fascinating to hear who was at the meeting tonight – and who made their excuses and stayed away to wash their hair. Remember to ask me how Anas reacted when an open-minded journalist who does not get his kicks by vicious attacks on our country’s minorities asked if he could interview him. Actually, I’ll tell you anyway very soon.

Broken Labour Party makes a new start – with a professional gay-hater

A few months ago I was assured by a concerned leading light in the local Labour Party that I was “utterly wrong” to keep suggesting that the association had slumped into a pit of homophobic extremism which would make them unelectable for a generation.

Outrageous comments by the candidate in the spring would, he said, not be repeated and they were addressing all concerns. Excellent, I said. Well done, guys. You will rise again.

So what has happened since? Well, now they have recruited professional gay-hater John Macleod, a bigot of the uncuddly Free Presbyterian persuasion. He attends all meetings and, I am told, boasts online about giving up his valuable time for long advice sessions with his favourite local Labour activists.

As some of those activists were in primary school at the time of the offences, we should perhaps enlighten them about their new pal and what he has written about other people’s sexuality.

Professional

Before he got sacked from The Herald for abusing the families of murdered girls, Macleod charmingly wrote that gays were “unnatural”, “dangerous”, and “evil”. He also linked homosexuality to “promiscuity, instability, neurosis, substance abuse, suicide, untold depths of degradation, misery, self-loathing”. Not content with that, he sunk to a new low when, although being careful to avoid claiming gays should be killed, as the Bible demands, instead said homosexuals were “simply not equipped to live”.

The monster Macleod even suggested, when Labour Party stalwart Ron Davies was caught on Clapham Common in some sort of situation with another man, that the gossip “perhaps, would cease only if Ron Davies were obligingly to kill himself.” His message was, and still is, very loud and very clear.

Nowadays, you will find openly-gay people online who say they know John Macleod and regard him as a friend.  It is obvious they don’t know his black history.

All that candidate Donald Crichton, a devout Free Church elder of course, did was propose South African-style discrimination by accommodation providers against same-sex guests. That, in five seconds, ensured he would never get anywhere near Holyrood. What the flawed genius Macleod will now do to further trash the reputation of the party of working people is anyone’s guess. And we can be sure the local executive will stand idly by twiddling their thumbs, as always. Nothing to do with us.

So when did John Macleod “convert” from the sneeps, the party which was so deeply embarrassed when he announced his deep love for it? Oh years ago, the Labour droids say. Really? How was it then that in April last year during a discussion about the leaders’ TV pitches, he wrote, in his tiresome self-inflating fashion, on the website of The Spectator: “My cynical but objective take – as an experienced journalist who will probably vote SNP – is that Clegg edged it …”

Scottish Labour leadership favourite Johann Lamont has pledged full support for gay rights in Scotland – including gay marriage. What a decent person like her will make of the latest stomach-churning goings-on at the islands’ branch remains to be seen. I have recently learned she and the deputy leadership candidate and their colleagues are avid readers of this blog. Good morning, all.

The ghastly truth behind all this is that when John Macleod spewed his bile about “untold depths of degradation, misery, self-loathing,” he was actually talking about just one sad, lonely man. Yep, John Macleod.

Uncomfortable Labour meeting backs Lamont and Sarwar

After a meeting described by some activists as “uncomfortable”, Western Isles Labour Party unanimously endorsed Glasgow Pollok MSP Johann Lamont as its choice for the new leader of the Scottish Labour Party.

Members also backed Glasgow Central MP Anas Sarwar as their choice for deputy.

Johann Lamont

In a statement, the party said that the fact that its activists in a region often and unfairly attacked for its supposed social conservatism had opted, albeit respectively, for a woman as Scottish Labour boss and a Muslim Scots-Asian as her second-in-command, would “startle” many.

However, local Labour activists took quiet satisfaction in simply picking the best folk for the jobs, it said.

Labour chairman Matt Bruce added: “There will be a ballot to allow all party members their final choice and then the new leaders for the Labour Scottish Parliament team will be able to offer an alternative to the current Scottish administration.”

Anas Sarwar

He said a voice for the islands needed to clearly point out the problems and to offer a better future by working together in Britain.

Ex-candidate Donald Crichton said: “Johann Lamont is highly experienced and was a solid minister. She’ll take the fight to Salmond and be a good friend for the Western Isles. And Anas will bring proven campaigning skills to the leadership, and reach the areas we need to win again.”

With her brother in Garrabost, on Lewis, and Tiree connections, the local party says it believes Johann Lamont is a well-known and highly respected figure in the Hebrides.

Despite the positivity of the party’s spin machine, other Labour insiders were far from happy and claimed the meeting was “uncomfortable” for some of the party faithful.

Some thought that the current leadership of the local party had managed to split it. They spoke of only some members being kept in the loop and of an incident in which a prominent member was “humiliated”.

Why hopefuls to lead political parties should all come up and see us sometime

Well done, Ruth Davidson. The election of the brand new leader of the Scottish Tories is a turn-up for a whole lot of reasons. She’s not old, she’s not boring, she’s not stinking rich and she’s not a man. This may be a good time to remind her that she failed at the first hurdle, as far as I’m concerned. When she came up to Stornoway to shake hands with all the important people she could find a few weeks ago, she didn’t come to see me.

Poor show. I’ve marked your card, missus. Her people told my people that that some other people hadn’t allocated any time for a wee chat. For goodness sake, I’d got the custard creams in specially. Maybe I should go easy on her. She is not just a former journalist, a Sunday school teacher but she is also a kickboxer. Ouch. Oh well, I’m sure the custard creams will keep until Johann Lamont appears. She is one of the Labour leadership candidates and she officially announces her campaign today. It will be lamentable of Lamont if she doesn’t make it here for a chinwag.

Murdo Fraser’s people were far more on the ball. They said they were happy for him to tell me and you, dear reader, what he was about when he came up. Except he didn’t. Methinks party bosses feel there are too few Tories here to make it worth the air fare. Nonsense. If they went to Goathill they’d find many a blue-blood. It’s crammed with very conservative Conservatives. Even my mate Cameraman has gone all Tory boy of late. He’s now sporting a blue car, a blue boat and, when he’s moaning about the prices, as he does all the time, he feels very blue.

Shame that Fraser didn’t make the effort to press some Hebridean flesh. I’d all sorts of deep and probing questions lined up for him. However, I am assured his failure to travel northwards was nothing to do with the fact I might have grilled him over why he quit the Free Presbyterians, then the APCs and when was he expecting to quit the Church of Scotland which I suspect is now far too namby-pamby for the likes of him.

Even that Davidson woman is a member. Anyone else think there are going to be ructions soon? Mr Fraser, I know someone who is selling what cricketers call a box. It’s good protection in case of accidental blows somewhere tender from someone practising martial arts. Such as, say, kickboxing?

So why do I feel so sure Labour hopeful Johann Lamont will make it here? Because a new street bears her name. As assistant deputy acting communities minister, or something, she helped fund a youth centre. Labour types somehow managed to get the address Lamont Lane for the new Bridge Centre because the wee dirt track beside it was unnamed. They said it was fitting recognition of Ms Lamont’s efforts. Nothing to do with the fact that it’s opposite the SNP office? “Is it? Oh, nothing to do with that at all.”

Just like remote, exposed, storm-blasted, South Uist has nothing to do with sunny Govan. They are now twinned by organisations which some think have too much time and cash on their hands. South Uist, or what’s left of it due to coastal erosion, is nothing like the inner-city village, nestling on the banks of the cool, calm Clyde.

Down Lochboisdale way is scenic, tranquil and an oasis in the maelstrom that is everyday life at the bottom end. Tourists come and stand in awe at the view out the loch, disturbed only by the roar and rumble of work on the new pier in the distance. Meander among the populace on a Friday evening and you may hear the occasional clink of whisky glasses. Another week of hard but honest toil is toasted in the Lochboisdale Hotel as the Atlantic laps the quay. “Och well, let’s hope we get a few more weeks out of this part of the contract. Slainte mhath.”

Govan, on the other hand, is loud and brash. Tourists come and stand in awe, thinking how lucky they are not to live there, disturbed by the roar of the subway and the rumble of expense claims being filled in at the BBC Scotland headquarters in the distance. If you dare get out of your car after 3pm on a Friday on Glasgow’s south side, you may be startled by the rat-tat-tat constant popping sounds. Fear not, ‘tis just the weekly ritual of champagne bottles being uncorked in someone’s lap in Pacific Quay. “Ooh, Ms Bird; your banter with the forecaster was simply marvellous, dahling. Bottoms up, everyone.”

Actually, I’ve changed my mind. There are such very strong simlarities between these communities that I must heap praise on Lochboisdale Amenity Trust, the Postcode Lottery’s Dream Fund and Oxfam for setting up such a unique and extremely useful partnership. Maybe Uist and Govan are indeed similar in some ways.

Hold on though, Govan is best-known for Rab C Nesbitt, that deadbeat, self-styled philosopher and style guru most often associated with lived-in pinstripe suits, plimsolls and holey underwear. South Uist has no one like that, surely? Well, I only see the local councillor Gerry Macleod in his business rig-out at the White House in Stornoway. However, put a can of Special Brew in his hand, stuff him into a string vest and, yes, I suppose, he could, well, maybe …

Aite mo Ghaoil? For some people, it’s very far from that.

Just imagine if you went into a shop for beans. I’ll have a large tin, you say. When you get home, you find they had deliberately given you a small tin of beans. Would you complain? Me too.So how do you think people feel when they think they are buying a place with land and then find out it’s not the three acres advertised by the estate agent, but just two.

That’s exactly what happens in some villages on Lewis where unprofessional solicitors and power-mad grazings committees are working together to rip off new arrivals. There is a foul  anti-incomer sentiment among some supposedly decent people which allows this to happen. Some areas are worse than others. People have fled in the face of this bullying. However, at last, because other villagers are disgusted, a clear picture is emerging of exactly who’s at it.

The acceptance by allegedly-professional individuals that it is OK to advertise something and later, after the sale, reveal to the buyer that they didn’t get what they thought is reaching epidemic proportions, according to my sources. Corrupt grazing clerks keep turning a blind eye when immoral villagers – usually a cousin or neighbour, of course – attempt to turn the ignorance of buyers to their own advantage.

Knowingly selling croftland as a fixed acreage and later claiming that no map or other records exist to confirm the boundaries is not only morally wrong but criminal. Yet it is happening regularly on this island. Buyers should be told before the transaction if there is no map-based register or other proof of boundaries so they have the facts in advance. It should never be up to whether random grazings committee members agree, or can remember, or think they can get you into bed.

The Crofters Commission has been aware of the problem of inaccurately-described parcels of land being flogged by slightly-dodgy lawyers for some years and wants to stop it, but hasn’t. The police know and have done nothing … yet. The Scottish Crofting Federation knows and has done nothing. A victim went to the MP who has done absolutely nothing. A victim went to the MSP who did absolutely nothing. Even the great campaigner for truth, The Stornoway Gazette, knows all about the conspiracy of grazings committee bullies and their legal sidekicks but has decided … well, you guessed it.

Claims that arguments over crofts and boundaries have always gone on is simply not a valid excuse. Victims are bullied if they object to the kangaroo court system of grazings management. One whom I know has had her sheep stolen. Intruders regularly go onto her property. Gates are mysteriously opened to let her sheep out. She and her children are regularly abused, usually with very unchristian obscenities, by the children of committee members. One such young yob tried to run her down.

Now though, there are decent residents in the village where racism and discrimination are rearing their ugly heads and they do speak privately about what is going on and who is doing it. Someone may have to start naming names soon. It may be me.

I don’t know what’s happened to some people over there. I always thought Aite Mo Ghaoil was a nice place.

Crooks behind Scottish Fuels rip-off exposed – so who is still loyal to them? And why?

UPDATE (Monday) – I’ve had a few calls. If people want a public meeting to decide the next course of action, fine. I’m up for it. We cannot do without fuel but we can, for example, stop buying confectionery, groceries, alcohol, etc., from filling station operators who are in bed with Scottish Fuels.

We can organise regular protest lines near them. We can also exercise our right to peaceful protest with frequent demonstrations at certain depots, if we decide that is the way to go. Ordinary members of staff must not be targeted. Senior management, of course, who dance to the tune of evil Irish crooks, are all fair game.

Let me say one thing – I would welcome elected representatives to be involved on condition they don’t use it as a platform to berate other parties and politicians. All recent governments have promised action but failed to stop us being ripped off. Everywhere I go, people say enough is enough and that it’s time for direct action since learning that Scottish Fuels are just unscrupulous crooks.

We must focus on an agreed outcome and strive for that – not on tiresome political mud-slinging. Otherwise, I’m out.

Well done to Brian Wilson for exposing the crooks behind Scottish Fuels in the West Highland Free Press. See here.

The former energy minister also made those claims to me live on a radio programme more than a week ago and I know that certain local listeners were utterly gobsmacked to hear about the company bosses of DCC, as they are properly known – as well as all their other names like Scottish Fuels, GB Oils Ltd, boilerjuice.com and the 41 other trading names they use, and their crooked dealings.  Good on Brian for putting it in print too.

The heat is on

I offered a radio slot to Scottish Fuels/DCC bosses since then too but they decided that answering difficult questions about their past illegal practises and alleged current racketeering on fuel prices was the last thing they wanted to do. However, it’s truly excellent journalism by Brian and the Free Press which certain other supposedly truth-seeking publications should have spent time on too instead of regurgitating the sickening guff and flannel that the dodgy Irish oil barons pumped out knowing that weak, lazy, ineffectual editors would run it unquestioningly.  We hope these publications weren’t pressured not to investigate by the Free Church stalwarts who work for them and the ones who are also on the Irish crooks’ payroll. That would be just awful.

It is no accident that that the cheapest petrol and diesel in the islands is from the one retailer at Barvas who has steadfastly refused to deal with the Irish crooks – unlike the other cowardly retailers elsewhere on the islands – some of whom have this week been trying to defend the crooks whose over-priced fuel they peddle. I have heard horrific tales of dirty tricks against the Welcome Inn in Barvas by Scottish Fuels minions. They really want to get rid of Mr Derek Macleod. Of course, they do. If they get rid of him then Scottish Fuels will have complete control of our fuel supplies and can charge whatever they like.

DCC were fined tens of thousands of pounds for 17 counts of overcharging in Wales. The local councils tore into them. The comhairle here of course is appalling – doing nothing, as usual. They should be leading the fightback. There is a rumour going round that a Scottish Fuels infiltrator is embedded in the comhairle at a high level to ensure they stay paralysed.  As I say, it’s just a rumour. It would be just too ridiculous to contemplate, so it’s probably not true.

It is extraordinary that our supposedly-honest fuel retailers – some of whom openly told me and other journalists how ghastly Scottish Fuels were just a few years ago – then caved in and signed new long contracts with them. Apparently, they were offered “incentives” like Christmas cases of booze, new pumps and, in the case of at least one remarkable alleged bribe, secret foreign holidays with an open tab, whatever that means.  One of the retailers told me face-to-face in a workshop in the industrial area of the town that he had been “threatened”. Now he is smugly on board with Scottish Fuels. Wonder what that sweetener was?

Finally, we have official confirmation of the type of company DCC really is and what hoodlums their people are – from insider trading, conning banana companies and their shareholders out of 41 million euros, setting up fake price comparison websites like boilerjuice.com that always led unwitting users back to DCC companies and products and, well, God only knows what else.