Monthly Archives: April 2011

Former candidate banned from election office

Your images are loading …

Which former parliamentary candidate has been told to stay away from his own party’s election office in Stornoway? With just a few days to go to an election, some of the party’s top people show how cack-handed they are at maintaining unity.

My man in the town centre tells me that a bolshie mainland-based apparatchik arrived to tell the party’s former candidate and his family to get lost. Apparently, they were distracting the other activists, “someone” was unhappy about stuff on Facebook, that sort of thing. No one locally had the balls to have a quiet word – least of all the candidate who remained in hiding.

The party faithful say loyalty isn’t worth tuppence right now. Some are deeply upset. Unsurprisingly, the rival party is cock-a-hoop. They were said to be in Tesco shopping for champagne.

Someone should sort it out, surely. Sadly, the campaign manager is nowhere to be found to sort anything out or to prevent threats of membership cards being thrown on a bonfire in Perceval Square. At last, a use for the “Waste Of Space”, as the former handy car-park, recently “enhanced” by the Stornoway Amenity Trust, is now widely known in many quarters including, before hasty withdrawal and editing, an official council document.

UPDATE : Another source from another party comes on to claim the candidate’s campaign manager has fled. He is, allegedly, taking part in a sporting fixture on the mainland rather than organising any of the cavalcades and flag-flying fun which the islands absolutely expect from serious contenders on a sunny Saturday before an election. So no fun here then. Maybe we shouldn’t be surprised.

UPDATE 2: I am told there may be an official denial of a ban, if they can manage to pretend they are all friends. However, if the feelings aired this afternoon are anything to go by, we could be waiting some time.

UPDATE 3:  A statement has arrived in the name of one Donald John Macsween. It says: “I’ll be voting Labour twice on Thursday to get a good local representative in and also to get good Labour MSPs on the list.”

UPDATE 4: Gosh. Another statement. “Former Labour group leader Callum Ian MacMillan said: “This is all nonsense. People should vote Labour to get rid of Alex Salmond. Right, Maciver. That’s all you’re getting. I’m off to church.” “

Unofficial radio debate reaction

By far the most comments are coming from people who say Peter Morrison, the LibDem candidate, made the most sense in the Isles FM debate.

A sample comment from “West Side Housewife”: “The Labour and SNP gentlemen were very disappointing on your show. They were both very defensive and obviously uncommitted to any serious change so the same problems will continue under them. I have decided I cannot support either of them. For the first time ever I will be voting LibDem. Mr Peter Morrison was impressive and honest.”

There are quite a few comments in similar vein. Other comments about the rival candidates are mostly unprintable. Are we about to see a late swing to the LibDems?

The net, not politicians, bit through Andrew Marr’s bar

In a police state as exemplified by the former South Africa, North Korea and even Cuba, which still has “difficult” journalists in jail for the last eight years, some facts cannot be discussed openly without permission of the authorities. Exactly what is now happening in the UK.

Marr's sick-making bar

So well done to everyone working behind the scenes to shame jug-eared hypocrite Andrew Marr, who is handed more than £600,000 of licence-payers’ cash each year, into admitting he paid for a super-injunction to bar reporting of his own inability to control his trouser zip. The drip-drip online campaign was superb.

As long as neanderthals with no interest in openness like the flawed Mr Justice Eady, a seriously out-of-touch judge, are allowed to rule on cases involving the rich with the morals of  alleycats and who buy official secrecy to hide their wrongdoings, they cannot rest. We cannot rest.

This has been the case for several years. What will be banned next? The stakes are so high they are the stuff of nightmares. Our windbag politicians only make empty promises to fix the broken system. They do nothing. They’re in the same clubs as the worst of the worst.

Let’s be clear; anyone who uses their wealth to get fancy lawyers to put the case for a super-injunction is doing something that is not available to the rest of us. They are hiding something grim. We are entitled to see them as liars and cheats and to treat them as such.

Marr says he is “embarrassed”. Funny how the Great Inquisitor only got queasy when the full details of his bare-faced deception were put on a certain website by people far more committed to unearthing the truth than himself.

Facts are facts. It is the internet, so often derided by those who care little for freedom of expression and want us all to toe their line, that will ultimately protect the victims – whether of brutality by Middle East dictators, abuse in the corridors of power in Washington and Pyongyang or deeply-damaging decisions by the pox-ridden unaccountable half-wits who preside in British courts only because of the schools they went to.

The Carloway hustings in pictures

A few shots from the evening at Carloway Community Centre.  The Conservative Party candidate didn’t make it:

Alasdair Allan, SNP

Donald Crichton, Labour

Peter Morrison, Lib Dem

Campaigner for better broadband

What about the voluntary sector?

There were SNP faithfuls

Locals had questions ...

Is that Red Ken?

Lords and ladies: read my guide on choosing that posh name

Press and Journal – 25 April 2011

MY MAN in the constitutional office tells me Uilleam and Katag may yet send out one or two late invitations to their wee wedding on Friday.

Yes, I am a sceptic about the whole thing, but one should be prepared in case one is asked to take up the seats left vacant by King Norodom Sihamoni of Cambodia, who is not now expected to attend. His missus has a hair appointment that day, or something.

So I have been looking up tips on how to be a guest at a royal wedding. It’s a really fascinating subject. One of the most important things to follow in this strict formula is to come up with the posh name you would use if you were invited to such a bit of a do.

Unless you’re an American, of course. My fellow islander Donald Trump, currently living in the US for work reasons, could also have been invited, I hear. But now that he is considering standing for president himself and is giving Barack Obama a hard time, he has been dumped.

Well, if they are looking for another islander . . .

Even if St James’s Palace writes to you as, for instance, plain old Iain Maciver, you should write back with a lah-di-dah monicker and you’ll get the invitation confirmed for a bit of nosh beside my old mate Lord Benjamin Inca Fogle Hampstead and Lord David Coco Beckham Leytonstone. No messing.

Let’s look at the instructions. First, you take the title Lord or Lady. Just take it? Yep, just start using a name that no one else has bagged. If anyone asks, just say Lord is your first name.

You then take the first name of one of your grandfathers. Fine, I’m doing well so far. You then take a name that is absolutely cherished in your family – and, yes, the name of a family pet is absolutely ideal for this purpose – and put it alongside the area you were born in.

Oh, I see. That’s what the toffs do.

There is already a Lord Carloway. If I remember right, he is actually called Colin. Hmm, I know someone who has a goldfish called Colin. I wonder if that’s how his lordship got his name? Hey, this is easy.

What next? Well, it was actually in a Glasgow hospital where I first saw the light of day. The institution was in Pollok, if my birth certificate is to be believed. I think I was there, but I don’t quite remember the details. Sorry.

And probably the pet which I remember most was Ginger. Ah Ginger, a completely misnamed lightly sandy-coloured puss.

There was something about the names my family chose for our animals. We had a few weird ones. There was a corncrake in the field beside our house. We often took its name in vain when it started its early-morning carry-on, croaking out its own name.

He was Eric. Every flippin’ morning: Eric, Eric, Eric . . .

On the basis of all that historical research, my aristocratic name would be Lord Johnny Ginger Pollok.

I like it. It makes me sound like one of these well-to-do racing drivers from the 50s and 60s.

Mrs X doesn’t like the last bit. She thinks it’s rude. Ooh, listen to her – Lady Sandie Randy X Plasterfield Prefabs.

What can I do? Drop the Pollok? Nah. I am very proud of my roots. Which is more than she is, if that bottle of hair colouring in the bathroom cabinet is anything to go by.

I suspect my Lady Muck would prefer to be hanging off the arm of someone with a name that’s grander and more distinguished. Something more manly, even.

Right, I’ll tweak it. I did have another grandfather and we had dogs, too. Can’t use Rebel, though. He died in disgrace having chased our postman and inserted his canines into the nether regions of that previously first-class male.

So I could take my posh name from our first multicoloured pet, Daisy. She was not a cow, but a collie. I told you – odd names.

Daisy was sound. Docile as anything, which was just as well, with a young, uncontrollable brat in the house who did unmentionable things to her. It was my wild wee brother, not me. I’m innocent of this one, officer.

You never heard it from me, but – because I know how Northern Constabulary types always scan this column in case I am passing on cryptic clues – if they want to nab the ghastly criminal who locked that poor animal in the wardrobe just before his parents went to bed, he’s your man.

’Twas he, too, who spoon-fed Rebel so many Haliboranges and laxatives that the poor animal was under the district nurse for a week.

No, there was no NHS for dogs back then, but she had to come in anyway, because my brat brother had also scoffed about three packets of the laxatives himself.

Officers, you’d better move fast. He is planning to flee back to his hidey-hole in distant Malaysia. In fact, he’s planning to secretly jet off today. I have a cast-iron source for this info – himself, he told me over a dram a couple of nights ago.

Meanwhile, if I receive a last-minute invitation to replace someone on Friday who has dropped out because of an uprising in their country, I shall be accompanying Lady X to the festivities.

What? You say Daisy is not manly enough for you in the surname, dear?

Fine. Let’s drop Daisy.

Wait a minute. I remember we used to have a daft cockerel that used to run round in circles in the same direction because one leg was longer than the other. I will take my posh name after him.

Lady X, you shall go to the ball – if that invitation does come – and you shall be the charming companion of Lord Angus Leftie Pollok.

The Shawbost “bomb”

As a brave bomb disposal expert risks life and limb in Shawbost, a posse of hacks and locals discuss world events.

My hair-raising handy hints on how to find that bargain bottle

Published in Press and Journal: 18/04/2011

IT’S good to stop now and again and peer into the future. Nothing wrong with speculating about what we will be doing 10 or 20 years from now.

We may have Charles, or William, as king. The Queen can’t go on forever – however much it may seem to poor Charles that she can.

Of course, the succession might skip the current heir altogether. Charles’s complicated private life may mean it goes straight to the “Hair to the Throne”, as he is being called by unkind newspaper people. Like me.

So what if he is losing his regal mane faster than a ball of dandelion seeds in a Force 10 gale? He has it all going on, so why should he be bothered?

However, it may come as a shock to the rest of us when Kojak becomes our sovereign ruler.

Bet you Wills will wear the crown more than his grannie to hide his untufted bonce.

So let us consider the follicle. So tiny as a single strand, our hair is immensely important for those who have a good headful, an indefinable tool that we use to signify that we are cool by having it long, that we are playful by flicking it or that we don’t want to be somewhere by claiming we have to stay in and wash it.

That excuse works much better for some than others. Like Wills.

I refer to the number of times I organised a surprise candlelit dinner for Mrs X in those far-off days when I was trying to impress her.

I would tidy my flat – well, scrape the biggest lumps of lard off last week’s dinner plates and shove them under the sink – and prepare the most sumptuous feast that you could pluck from a Safeway supermarket freezer.

Then I would call her up, only for her to say she wasn’t coming out. She was washing her hair.

What? Again? I had to tell her I had already defrosted a pack of Super Saver sausages. They were on special offer.

Hah, for some reason, she still wasn’t interested. Gutted, I was.

That girl must have really filthy hair, I thought. If she is going to be at it all night with the shampoo when she could be here with me and a large pack of Super Savers, maybe I had just had a lucky escape.

It was all a ruse, of course, just to try to keep me interested. It wasn’t long before the allure of my meaty treat brought her galloping round to mine.

Not being a skinflint, I really gave her a great evening. We were at it all night. You’d be surprised just how many sausages Safeway managed to squeeze into a Super Saver pack back then.

It just shows that you can get great value without spending a fortune if you know what you’re doing.

That was borne out with confirmation that a test involving hundreds of people at the Edinburgh Science Festival showed few could taste the difference between cheap plonk and expensive wine costing about £30 a bottle.

People who spend into double figures for Chateau this and Classico that are just paying for the label. They are but sheep who fall for the old marketing trick of over-pricing stuff to give a fake impression of quality.

A well-known Gael often boasts of never drinking wine costing less than £40 – and that’s not the table price, either. And a fellow-islander here on Lewis spent more than £1,000 on a case of Cabernet Sauvignon last festive season. Jesus Christ: would he have approved?

All fantastic news, even for part-time connoisseurs of the grape fermenté, like myself. We are not cheapskates; we appreciate quality at the right price. Anything else is a waste.

I have long known that all wine sellers have a big secret. Usually tucked well in on the bottom shelf, this is the label they will never recommend to Joe Bloggs but which is for those specially-favoured patrons. Unfortunately, as their most frequent and highest-spending customers are rich middle-class plonkies with frazzled palates, which of course in the Outer Hebrides merely means they work for the council, that is also a terrible waste of a fine drop.

Yes, even your local supermarket will have the same secret policy. They will rarely admit it, but there is always an incredibly cheap bottle that does not taste like the grapes were gently squeezed along with the contents of several cats’ bladders. It is certainly true here in Stornoway, although often only senior staff will know.

Ever the public servant, I would be happy to share with you the names on the labels to look for, but I am worried they could sell out so quickly that there would be none left for me. So, to slow down the rush, maybe I should ask for a small consideration for such valuable and possibly life-changing information.

What should I ask for? A case of Châteauneuf-du-Pape, maybe? It’s not really for myself, you see. Just for the purposes of research.

While I am on the subject of monumental wastes of resources, despite the avalanche of correspondence since last week, I am not going on again about the celebrations on the 29th for the royal wedding.

All I said was people should be allowed to do what they want and that council workers should be grateful they are getting a completely undeserved day off just because they have irresponsible bosses who care little for the suffering of ordinary taxpayers and the people in this country who actually work.

That’s all I said. Let it go.

In fact, when I think about it, I didn’t even say that. But I’m saying it now.

Yes, I’ve had letters saying I should organise alternative street parties without union flags and with big banners saying “What Wedding?” and “Kate Who?”

Sorry, I can’t. I’m busy that day.

I’m washing my hair.

Muriel Gray versus a TV crew from Taiwan

This is the radio interview I did with the wonderfully unflappable Scottish writer and broadcaster, Muriel Gray.  It is not technically perfect. That is not just down to my incompetence this time because a TV crew from Taiwan came and began setting up for their interviews beside us.
Muriel was great. Towards the end of our chat, I was much too flirty and too cheeky to her but she dealt with it with her usual aplomb and good grace. Muriel, thank you.

The run-up to the First World War

The reasons for the First World War are many and varied and often depend not only on which country you are in and also in what period you are giving your account. A pupil in the Nicolson Institute in Stornoway, Scotland, described the fraught situation in Europe prior to hosilities as follows:

“WWI started because a Serbian gang killed Franz Ferdinand and then Austria-Hungary started yelling at them like: “Oh no, you didn’t?” and then Russia was like: “What you saying to my best friend forever, Serbia?!”
And then Germany was like: “Don’t you dare touch my homie, Austria-Hungary!!” and then France was like “Sacre bleu! You messin’ with mon ami, Russia?!”

%^&* YOOOOU

Germany then said: “You are so gay, France!” so they snuck through Berlin who started crying: “Whoa whoa whoa whoa. Help!! help!!” and Britain was like: “You know how sensitive Berlin is. You’re so gonna pay for that!”
And then Germany and Austria-Hungary replied “%^&* YOOOOU!!!” and then Russia, France and Britain yelled: “Bring it on!”
Meanwhile, Serbia was like: “Hehehe… oops…” and Italy then yelled: “Mama mia, my pizza is burning!”

Poorest in society suffer when our council suck up to the royals

Published in Press and Journal: 11/04/2011

POOR SamCam. The prime minister’s other half was hoping to sneak off for a few days’ R&R in the Malaga sun with her fella to celebrate her big four-oh.

Some guttersnipe called Beckett Fish spotted them lolloping in the Stansted departures area looking fed up waiting for their cheapy-cheapy, cheap-cheap Ryanair flight. He had his iPhone and . . . click, click, click.

It’s so wrong. Our premier should be showing a bit more decorum. Poor dears. Could they not afford something a bit more classy? The answer is not no.

Save your sympathy. Worth a cool £30million and a former media PR supremo, Dave pulled off a superlative bit of staged fakery. Many clues were there to be sniffed out by a twisted and cynical person. Like me, you say? Whatever.

Ryanair flights are always jam-packed. Where were the other passengers? Why was no one sat near them? Where were the papers the PM must always have to hand when he travels? And the minders? Gruamach means glum in Gaelic and they were very gruamach.

That’s because SamCam and DavCam were mere actors in a well-rehearsed piece of theatre.

Those piccies of a bedraggled pair of passengers saving the pennies went round the world. The Camerons knew that Beckett, or some other fish, would take the bait.

Gruamach and Gruamacher

It worked brilliantly. Showing themselves not to be extravagant or insensitive to the plight of ordinary people, they were tightening their fur-lined crocodile-skin belts, with the antique brass buckles, like the rest of us. They shared the pain.

Good on them, said the country. If they make an effort, so must we. Cancel the caviar; just five courses tonight.

The Camerons played a blinder. They’ll be remembered as being suitably gruamach until the election. A vote-winner.

Not that we have not had a stroke of vote-harvesting genius in Scotland this week with the launch of the parties’ manifestos. No, I don’t mean Scottish Labour’s promise to “abolish the failed Scottish Labour”. Although that was fairly interesting, too.

It was Alex Salmond’s SNP which pulled off a cracker. OK, his daft promise to keep rotten old schools open and prevent kiddies from enjoying the advantages of education in well-kitted-out larger schools was rubbish.

His fly move, though, may win him the election in May. He promised everyone in Scotland superfast broadband if the SNP gets in. It’ll cost £50million, but “no one will be left behind”. What a masterstroke.

Forget your boring cheap ferry travel or a new Mallaig-Lochboisdale ferry. Salmond may as well have said he would give £1,000 and a big wet kiss to every single person in return for an X on the ballot paper. Actually, forget that bit about the immense moist snog. Did I dream that? Shouldn’t have had that late cheese and pickle sandwich last night.

Faster broadband is something people here really need. They’ve heard rumours that, in far-off places, like on the mainland, people have lightning-fast speeds for low cost while theirs chugs along with all the zooming rapidity of an ancient, arthritic hippopotamus.

Like Cameron, Salmond was being sensitive to what ordinary people want to hear.

For instance, some people want a palaver over the royal wedding. Should we really take a holiday to celebrate the coming together of a couple of privileged toffs with good teeth whose excruciating dullness is shovelled under our noses daily? Not for me, ta.

Thankfully, this not being Korea, we have the freedom to say we don’t approve of such garish trashiness.

Local authorities up and down the country are properly exercising their right to save their cash and not give unearned holidays to staff. Workers can still take it out of their entitlement if they want to be sad and wave union flags at parties in their honour – or, more likely, at the telly.

Despite our fondness for boogying on down, hardly anyone in Scotland wants a cringeworthy 1950s-style street party. In this information age, it goes against the grain to toady to anyone – especially unelected aristocrats. Most people will go to the pub, where they can hurl ghastly insults at Kate and her dress as the newlyweds glide past the cameras looking down their noses at their subjects-in-waiting.

Sectarianism is completely unacceptable, except in our Free Churches, of course, so the great unwashed have to direct their venom at something. And they are it.

What did hard-up Western Isles Council decide? Councillors here have gone all sycophantic and decided, despite the impression given by their current and scandalously-unreported efforts to slash hard-pressed home carers’ mileage allowances, oceans of spare cash are sloshing about in the coffers.

So it’s granting a paid holiday on the 29th to anybody and everybody – provided they work for the council.

Party on, dudes, they said. It’ll put a smile on the faces of the wretched workers. They need cheering up, they said. Well, when you see their faces, we can’t argue with that.

Not a single application for a street party, but the public sector can trot off to the boozer with the rest of the plebs – and be paid for it.

A poker-faced municipal mandarin was asked how not just thousands but tens of thousands of pounds could be justified. He blathered on that it was a fillip to the economy because the Queen and her husband take holidays here.

No she doesn’t, pen-pusher. Her Maj’s vacations are afloat on an English-owned boat and she takes picnics, bought in Harrods, London SW1, to scoff in distant places like Sandray and Little Bernera, where grubby oiks won’t see her scoffing her Scotch eggs.

The official also said it would be good for morale if council staff could join in the merriment for Wills and Kate.

Knowing how that lot can put it away, they’ll be merry all right.

Still, it’s on a Friday, so they’ll have the whole weekend to recover.