Category Archives: corruption

Scottish Government set to nobble grazings committee bullies

Well well. Wonder who else is reading this blog?  Just hours after I mentioned appalling bullying by certain out-of-control Lewis grazings committee members – some of them who you would think would know better – the Scottish Government contacts a victim of these vicious bullies to confirm a proper map-based Crofting Register is being introduced as Part 2 of the Crofting Reform (Scotland) Act 2010.

Incoming crofters will soon be able to fix the boundaries based on the sale and other documents and objectors will have to come up with proper evidence if they think it is inaccurate.  It may not completely stop the ongoing harrassment in certain Lewis villages but putting that into the Act instead of the current haphazard and unfair procedure by leaving it all up to the Little Hitlers on these committees is a splendid first step.

I have also heard today from people who have had to leave this island because of campaigns against them by these committees without shame.  Nothing official, making life difficult, stealing, damaging, always at night. Drunkards and church-goers. They have all been at it. Makes you proud, eh?

As well as knowingly selling land they know will be snatched back by grazings committees, some solicitors know about the intimidation and turn a blind eye. If anyone else is unhappy about how island solicitors – and certain ones in Inverness – are handling these transactions, please let me know.  Let’s build up some firm evidence – just like they would do.  After all, one of these solicitors – who has obviously been watching too many Ku Klux Klan films – recently gave one woman the wonderful advice: “You’d better move on somewhere else. It is useless to complain. This is how things are done here. No one will listen to you – not even the press.”

Er, excuse me, Mr Dodgy Solicitor.  That may have been the case then. Now some of us are definitely listening – and writing.

Aite mo Ghaoil? For some people, it’s very far from that.

Just imagine if you went into a shop for beans. I’ll have a large tin, you say. When you get home, you find they had deliberately given you a small tin of beans. Would you complain? Me too.So how do you think people feel when they think they are buying a place with land and then find out it’s not the three acres advertised by the estate agent, but just two.

That’s exactly what happens in some villages on Lewis where unprofessional solicitors and power-mad grazings committees are working together to rip off new arrivals. There is a foul  anti-incomer sentiment among some supposedly decent people which allows this to happen. Some areas are worse than others. People have fled in the face of this bullying. However, at last, because other villagers are disgusted, a clear picture is emerging of exactly who’s at it.

The acceptance by allegedly-professional individuals that it is OK to advertise something and later, after the sale, reveal to the buyer that they didn’t get what they thought is reaching epidemic proportions, according to my sources. Corrupt grazing clerks keep turning a blind eye when immoral villagers – usually a cousin or neighbour, of course – attempt to turn the ignorance of buyers to their own advantage.

Knowingly selling croftland as a fixed acreage and later claiming that no map or other records exist to confirm the boundaries is not only morally wrong but criminal. Yet it is happening regularly on this island. Buyers should be told before the transaction if there is no map-based register or other proof of boundaries so they have the facts in advance. It should never be up to whether random grazings committee members agree, or can remember, or think they can get you into bed.

The Crofters Commission has been aware of the problem of inaccurately-described parcels of land being flogged by slightly-dodgy lawyers for some years and wants to stop it, but hasn’t. The police know and have done nothing … yet. The Scottish Crofting Federation knows and has done nothing. A victim went to the MP who has done absolutely nothing. A victim went to the MSP who did absolutely nothing. Even the great campaigner for truth, The Stornoway Gazette, knows all about the conspiracy of grazings committee bullies and their legal sidekicks but has decided … well, you guessed it.

Claims that arguments over crofts and boundaries have always gone on is simply not a valid excuse. Victims are bullied if they object to the kangaroo court system of grazings management. One whom I know has had her sheep stolen. Intruders regularly go onto her property. Gates are mysteriously opened to let her sheep out. She and her children are regularly abused, usually with very unchristian obscenities, by the children of committee members. One such young yob tried to run her down.

Now though, there are decent residents in the village where racism and discrimination are rearing their ugly heads and they do speak privately about what is going on and who is doing it. Someone may have to start naming names soon. It may be me.

I don’t know what’s happened to some people over there. I always thought Aite Mo Ghaoil was a nice place.

Crooks behind Scottish Fuels rip-off exposed – so who is still loyal to them? And why?

UPDATE (Monday) – I’ve had a few calls. If people want a public meeting to decide the next course of action, fine. I’m up for it. We cannot do without fuel but we can, for example, stop buying confectionery, groceries, alcohol, etc., from filling station operators who are in bed with Scottish Fuels.

We can organise regular protest lines near them. We can also exercise our right to peaceful protest with frequent demonstrations at certain depots, if we decide that is the way to go. Ordinary members of staff must not be targeted. Senior management, of course, who dance to the tune of evil Irish crooks, are all fair game.

Let me say one thing – I would welcome elected representatives to be involved on condition they don’t use it as a platform to berate other parties and politicians. All recent governments have promised action but failed to stop us being ripped off. Everywhere I go, people say enough is enough and that it’s time for direct action since learning that Scottish Fuels are just unscrupulous crooks.

We must focus on an agreed outcome and strive for that – not on tiresome political mud-slinging. Otherwise, I’m out.

Well done to Brian Wilson for exposing the crooks behind Scottish Fuels in the West Highland Free Press. See here.

The former energy minister also made those claims to me live on a radio programme more than a week ago and I know that certain local listeners were utterly gobsmacked to hear about the company bosses of DCC, as they are properly known – as well as all their other names like Scottish Fuels, GB Oils Ltd, boilerjuice.com and the 41 other trading names they use, and their crooked dealings.  Good on Brian for putting it in print too.

The heat is on

I offered a radio slot to Scottish Fuels/DCC bosses since then too but they decided that answering difficult questions about their past illegal practises and alleged current racketeering on fuel prices was the last thing they wanted to do. However, it’s truly excellent journalism by Brian and the Free Press which certain other supposedly truth-seeking publications should have spent time on too instead of regurgitating the sickening guff and flannel that the dodgy Irish oil barons pumped out knowing that weak, lazy, ineffectual editors would run it unquestioningly.  We hope these publications weren’t pressured not to investigate by the Free Church stalwarts who work for them and the ones who are also on the Irish crooks’ payroll. That would be just awful.

It is no accident that that the cheapest petrol and diesel in the islands is from the one retailer at Barvas who has steadfastly refused to deal with the Irish crooks – unlike the other cowardly retailers elsewhere on the islands – some of whom have this week been trying to defend the crooks whose over-priced fuel they peddle. I have heard horrific tales of dirty tricks against the Welcome Inn in Barvas by Scottish Fuels minions. They really want to get rid of Mr Derek Macleod. Of course, they do. If they get rid of him then Scottish Fuels will have complete control of our fuel supplies and can charge whatever they like.

DCC were fined tens of thousands of pounds for 17 counts of overcharging in Wales. The local councils tore into them. The comhairle here of course is appalling – doing nothing, as usual. They should be leading the fightback. There is a rumour going round that a Scottish Fuels infiltrator is embedded in the comhairle at a high level to ensure they stay paralysed.  As I say, it’s just a rumour. It would be just too ridiculous to contemplate, so it’s probably not true.

It is extraordinary that our supposedly-honest fuel retailers – some of whom openly told me and other journalists how ghastly Scottish Fuels were just a few years ago – then caved in and signed new long contracts with them. Apparently, they were offered “incentives” like Christmas cases of booze, new pumps and, in the case of at least one remarkable alleged bribe, secret foreign holidays with an open tab, whatever that means.  One of the retailers told me face-to-face in a workshop in the industrial area of the town that he had been “threatened”. Now he is smugly on board with Scottish Fuels. Wonder what that sweetener was?

Finally, we have official confirmation of the type of company DCC really is and what hoodlums their people are – from insider trading, conning banana companies and their shareholders out of 41 million euros, setting up fake price comparison websites like boilerjuice.com that always led unwitting users back to DCC companies and products and, well, God only knows what else.

Why did Boris Johnson defend corrupt Met Commissioner?

Something smells in London. I couldn’t believe it when Mayor Boris Johnson seemed to say on TV that Met Commissioner Sir Paul Stephenson resigned because there were so many distractions to him doing a good job.
No. Sir Paul resigned because he was exposed as corrupt having taken a £12,000 freebie and because he was trying to hide that he was very pally with ex-News of the World editor Neil Wallis, who he knew was directly connected to the donor. Simple.
Sir Paul has also been exposed as having tried to stop the Guardian investigating in 2009 while he himself was dining out with Murdoch people. Could it be that the Mayor is somehow involved in this too? I think even more high-up heads could roll.
It is a mystery how Acting Deputy Commissioner John Yates is still in place having virtually admitted he is useless and that he closed an inquiry without even examining the evidence. Still, it’s only 9pm.
This is going to lead directly to David Cameron.

Stornoway media bosses will be lightly grilled

Media bosses are set to be hauled before a powerful select committee to explain secret surveillance tactics which, it is widely suspected, are carried out on an industrial scale.

However, it has emerged that the policy and resources committee cannot order big boss Rupert Morrison to attend because he is an alien. He’s from Lochs.

However, Mistress Rebekah Gillen, his Managing Editor of Lapse Indicating Newspaper Deep-throat Activities, will be summoned to the White House to explain why she has been intruding on the lives of ordinary people by ordering her staff to secretly photograph cars while pretending to highlight bad parking.

Last week saw a rash of even more extraordinary claims. Island readers were treated to such shockers as “Parking watch promised following complaints” and an outrageous exclusive front page shocker, which confirmed the extent to which Gillen has managed to get close to high-ranking officers at Northern Constabulary. It said: “Police ask you to tell them about bad parking.”

Despite the mounting evidence of an unhealthy relationship, Assistant Commissioner Gordon MacYates said: “What? I know nothing. How did you get this number?”

One angry motorist told us: “Up until now the photos Mrs Rebekah published were of poorly-parked cars in places away from Stornoway town centre. Then the mood changed when she last week published a photo of an Inverness flooring van. She pixelated the number plate but not the name of The Floor Centre.
“Great free advertising for them – which is a first from her paper. She certainly doesn’t do that for local companies. She and Rupert always squeeze them dry.
“It is obviously a cover-up. If she was really interested in parking, she would be taking photos of the lawbreakers who clog up the town’s streets on Sundays. They are the real villains. It’s one rule for them and another for us.”

Stornoway resident Mrs Angry said: “I am one of that woman’s victims. She took photos of my car while I was in the chemist. What do you think of that? To get my own back, I’ve been hiding with a camera behind a bin close to Whopping Press headquarters on Francis Street but I haven’t seen her.
“I’ve also heard a rumour that she is now disguised as someone with distinctive black hair. Everyone should keep an eye out for her.”In a terse statement from Whopping Press, Mrs Rebekah said: “Rupert and I have co-operated fully throughout this inquiry. If any boobs come to light, we will certainly look at them.”

Meanwhile, there have been suggestions the raven-haired press boss is already far too close to members of the policy and resources committee.  Sources say she has been seen cosying up to committee chairman Angus Campbell and vice-chair Norman Macdonald who have recently been busy ensuring there has never been more work on the island – but not for any local companies. Maybe they have much in common.

In a joint response to our questions, they slurred: “Were we at darling Rebekah’s birthday party? Can you prove it? We go to many birthday parties – don’t we, Nigel – but that doesn’t mean we can remember who we spoke to or even whose birthday it was. Anyone got any more champagne?
“See you? You’re my best pal ……”

Yates of the Yard and cash for honours

So Assistant Commissioner Yates of the Met Police was just spouting rubbish when he said there was no evidence of phone hacking.   The evidence is being looked at again with different results.

AC Yates also claimed there was no evidence of Labour accepting cash for honours and the complaint by Angus Macneil MP went nowhere. How long until someone else starts looking at that evidence again?

Councillors must not interfere with FoI responses

Courtesy: Press Gazette

Paper exposes council leader’s FoI ‘meddling’

24 May 2011

A council leader faces a misconduct investigation after his local newspaper revealed he was “meddling” in Freedom of Information requests.  In March, Huddersfield Daily Examiner senior reporter Katie Grant got hold of potentially damning emails that appeared to show the leader of Kirklees Council, Mehboob Khan, amending FOI requests before they were sent out.

In one example, the council was asked how much council tax was owed by people living in Kirklees, including all overdue payments, and the council’s FoI officer prepared a full response dating back to 1993, which was then sent to Khan. However, in an email exchange with the officer, Khan said: “This is not going out. Who prepared the response?”. That led to a new response being put together by the council – which only included figures for the financial year 2010/11.

In another case, the council’s FoI officer received requests asking how much the council spent on celebrities for local events. The officer prepared a response but Khan appeared to prevent the information from being released – telling the officer: “I suggest this response … you will notice that it is different. I refer to your recent enquiry regarding the use of celebrities by the council. I have trawled our various services and unfortunately this information is not collated in one central place.”

Ironically, Khan’s involvement was exposed by an FoI request submitted by Grant requesting email correspondence between Khan and the FoI officer. Khan, meanwhile, has denied any wrongdoing, claiming he was trying to put things into “context” and “improve” the information sent back to applicants. He told the Examiner that he had only amended one per cent of all FoIs he received.

Grant said suspicions were raised when the council sent back the FoI on council tax payments. She said: “We had lots of trouble getting the numbers back, and it was a simple question. We couldn’t see why weren’t getting a response.” Last week, the council decided there was a case for Khan to answer, after allegations made by the newspaper showed Khan “may have compromised the impartiality of council officers”.

The council also found that: “The allegations also raise the issue of whether the subject member had used or attempted to use his position as a member improperly to confer on or secure for himself or any other person an advantage or disadvantage.” Grant said she is surprised none of the national press has picked up the story, particularly when you consider Khan also sits on the Standards for England Board – an organisation set up to champion “and promote high standards of conduct amongst our local politicians”.

A spokesperson for the organisation told the Examiner that Khan would be excluded from involvement in the board’s case-handling activities while the investigation was ongoing.

Naming Private Ryan

There was a day you could expect Labour people to stand up for our rights and freedoms. No longer. To see John Prescott and Tom Harris tearing into John Hemming, a brave Lib Dem MP, for naming Ryan Giggs in parliament, was stomach-churning.

It is for MPs to legislate and for judges to interpret. Fine. Not a mention from the

Up the people

the two representatives of the party of the working class that super-injunctions are the preserve only of the very wealthy so the their effectiveness should be undermined wherever possible. The betrayal of ordinary people by these two pro-establishment poodles is complete.

The lure of Lib Dem bashing was also irresistible to Alasdair Campbell. So his name too is on the list for when the great day comes.  Power to the people.

Super-injunction footballer hoodwinked over Twitter action

I feel so very, very sorry for the footballer trying to sue Twitter.  The fact that the American constitution safeguards freedom of speech (unlike the UK), he doesn’t have a cat in hell’s. Their attitude is publish and be damned – but only if it is inaccurate, not just embarrassing.

The solicitor who advised him should know that. He should have been advised it is all a waste of time. Therefore, the poor ball-booter is wasting oodles of his hard-earned (sic) on chasing something that simply cannot happen.

And because of “the Streisand effect” – going to law causing more attention than ever for something someone is keeping quiet – the action he is taking is going to incinerate his case. Interested? You should look up Streisand Effect on Wikipedia – it may even a certain footballer’s name still listed there …

All the time, the solicitor’s meter is running. Of course solicitors Schillings will always advise the footballer to sue. They are charging a whack by the half hour “plus disbursements”.  A cynic may suggest that an unscrupulous solicitor may have no interest in winning but a lot of interest in a fat fee for shoving a daft wee snowball into the sulphurous fires of hell.

The net, not politicians, bit through Andrew Marr’s bar

In a police state as exemplified by the former South Africa, North Korea and even Cuba, which still has “difficult” journalists in jail for the last eight years, some facts cannot be discussed openly without permission of the authorities. Exactly what is now happening in the UK.

Marr's sick-making bar

So well done to everyone working behind the scenes to shame jug-eared hypocrite Andrew Marr, who is handed more than £600,000 of licence-payers’ cash each year, into admitting he paid for a super-injunction to bar reporting of his own inability to control his trouser zip. The drip-drip online campaign was superb.

As long as neanderthals with no interest in openness like the flawed Mr Justice Eady, a seriously out-of-touch judge, are allowed to rule on cases involving the rich with the morals of  alleycats and who buy official secrecy to hide their wrongdoings, they cannot rest. We cannot rest.

This has been the case for several years. What will be banned next? The stakes are so high they are the stuff of nightmares. Our windbag politicians only make empty promises to fix the broken system. They do nothing. They’re in the same clubs as the worst of the worst.

Let’s be clear; anyone who uses their wealth to get fancy lawyers to put the case for a super-injunction is doing something that is not available to the rest of us. They are hiding something grim. We are entitled to see them as liars and cheats and to treat them as such.

Marr says he is “embarrassed”. Funny how the Great Inquisitor only got queasy when the full details of his bare-faced deception were put on a certain website by people far more committed to unearthing the truth than himself.

Facts are facts. It is the internet, so often derided by those who care little for freedom of expression and want us all to toe their line, that will ultimately protect the victims – whether of brutality by Middle East dictators, abuse in the corridors of power in Washington and Pyongyang or deeply-damaging decisions by the pox-ridden unaccountable half-wits who preside in British courts only because of the schools they went to.