Monthly Archives: March 2011

Western Isles election candidates announced

SCOTTISH PARLIAMENT ELECTION
NA H-EILEANAN AN IAR CONSTITUENCY

DATE OF ELECTION: THURSDAY 5 MAY 2011

STATEMENT OF PERSONS NOMINATED AND NOTICE OF POLL

The following persons have been and now stand nominated for election as a Member to serve in the Scottish Parliament for the Na h-Eileanan an Iar Constituency.

Alasdair James Allan
Scottish National Party (SNP)
13A Vatisker, Isle of Lewis, HS2 0JS

Donald Finlayson Crichton
Scottish Labour Party
21 Swordale, Point, Isle of Lewis, HS2 0BP

Charlie McGrigor
Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
Upper Sonachan, By Dalmally, Argyll, PA33 1BJ

Peter Angus Morrison
Scottish Liberal Democrats
52 Newmarket, Stornoway, HS2 0ED

1 As more than one person stands nominated, a poll will be taken on Thursday 5 May 2011 between the hours of 7.00am and 10.00pm. The names of the candidates will be printed on the ballot papers for this constituency election in the same order as above.

2 A poll will also be taken for the election of seven Regional Members of the Scottish Parliament.

3 The polls at the Scottish Parliamentary election in this Constituency will be combined with the poll for the Referendum on the voting system for UK parliamentary elections in the Na h-Eileanan an Iar voting area.

4 Applications, amendments or cancellations of postal votes must reach the Electoral Registration Officer at 42 Point Street, Stornoway, Isle of Lewis by 5.00pm on Thursday 14 April 2011.

5 Applications to vote by proxy at this election must reach the Electoral Registration Officer at 42 Point Street, Stornoway, Isle of Lewis by 5.00pm on Thursday 21 April 2011.

6 Applications to vote by proxy at this election applied for on grounds of physical incapacity, where that physical incapacity occurred after 5.00pm on Thursday 21 April 2011 must reach the Electoral Registration Officer by 5.00pm on Thursday 5 May 2011.

Malcolm Burr
Returning Officer
Council Offices
Sandwick Road
STORNOWAY
Isle of Lewis

29 March 2011

So who is the mysterious Gaelic singer with the big pop star?

Published in Press and Journal 28/3/2011

I’LL tell you what’s a lovely word and miles better than its English equivalent. Norrag.

Great word. Nor-rag. It suggests something rare and small, yet it is so precise that it must be something you can only benefit from.

Everyone has heard someone use it, but they often forget to check with their local teuchter to find out exactly what it means.

You must always get the meaning confirmed when you come across an unfamiliar Gaelic word. It could mean anything.

I used to have an old English-born widow for a neighbour. Let’s call her Mary, because that was her name. She told me once how she always felt better for the rest of the day if she slept for half an hour after lunch.

So I would cheerfully inquire if I saw her in the afternoon as to whether or not she had taken her norrag yet. It means a nap, you see.

However, each time I asked, for some strange reason, the battling grannie would immediately scold me in that mischievous way that reminded me of a comedian off the telly.

“Oh, stop it. What do you take me for?” she would say, before giving me a clout round the back of the head for my trouble. I got walloped every time.

Don’t think 78-year-olds can’t hurt you. Ouch.

Her assault made me feel like the foil for that blousy Dick Emery character. When asked some question with a saucy double-meaning, the response was always: “Ooh, you are awful. But I like you.”

The comedian would then playfully thump his open-mouth victim before scurrying off on unfeasible heels. It felt a bit like that.

After months of being assaulted by this pugilistic pensioner, I discovered she thought a norrag was a dram.

Convinced I was suggesting she was on the gin rather earlier in the day than would be proper for a gentle-lady of her years, her strategy to stop me besmirching her reputation was to knock seven bells out of me.

Kenneth Clarke had 40 winks during the chancellor’s Budget speech. Mind you, having seen him recently turn up in parliament with a black eye, maybe I shouldn’t ask if he enjoyed his norrag.

How to have a norrag

Dick Emery reminded me of the women on high heels I saw the other day, rushing for the Point bus.

Two of them atop the highest heels somehow tripped on the pedestrian crossing outside the Clydesdale Bank. Poor dears, they ended up in close contact with the tarmacadam.

A double Naomi Campbell. Four ankles, knees and heels flailing about as the wee green man, and goodness knows what else, was flashing away.

Sorry, ladies. It wasn’t funny. Probably quite sore afterwards, were we? Could have happened to anyone. They were just unlucky.

And how do I know all this? They may remember that white van man who stopped at the lights and offered to help them in their moment of humiliating distress? ’Twas I. Yes, I saw it all.

Only their pride was badly bruised, I hear. I don’t know why I mentioned it. I promise I won’t do it again – at least not without naming names to really give the lassies a red face to go with their red behinds.

When it comes to naming names for the most surprising broadcast this week, I think the prize goes to the BBC’s Gaelic request programme Durachdan.

Normally, tuning in to Radio nan Gaidheal at teatime on Friday, you can be sure you will hear fine old Gaelic songs sung the way they should be, often by great, talented people who are no longer with us – and Costello, of Flair fame.

Not so at the end of last week. Not only did Ailig in Inverness and his co-presenter in Aberdeen, the other Ailig, have a certain jauntiness not often found in traditional music programmes, but they even played a track from a top-selling international chart star with fans in the millions.

Not Costello this time.

They played Cee Lo Green. He’s the guy who did the song with the rude lyrics that eventually became the cleaned-up chart-topper Forget You.

Cee Lo Green on Na Durachdan? How did that happen? It’s like Aled Jones doing Songs of Praise from The Free Church (Continuing).

It turns out that Green, who was also the guy in that Gnarls Barkley outfit which did Crazy a few years ago, recently did a New York R&B tune called The Language of Love. And it’s got loads of Gaelic in it.

And it’s no bad – as far as misty-eyed Gaelic ballads with a hint of R&B go.

Neither Ailig nor Ailig, both veritable masters in the art of analysing Gaelic performances, had any clue who was the female Gael with the delightful tones.

They even appealed for listeners to help. Not a beeg from anyone, even though that programme has listeners calling in from places like Australia, Algeria and Airidhbhruaich.

What do I think? Methinks it’s Cathy Ann MacPhee, who is nowadays to be found in Ottawa. Cathy Ann still hasn’t answered my question asking if that is her. So I think it probably is.

The Barra-born First Lady of Gaelic Song is probably thinking: “That big star Cee Lo Green wants me to keep my role in this song hush-hush and now Maciver is on my Facebook asking tricky questions about it. Trust him to recognise me.

“I’d better not upset an international superstar in case he is planning to give me a bigger role in something else. What am I going to do? I’d better not respond. Yeah, that’s what I’ll do. Nothing.”

Either that, or it’s not Cathy Ann at all.

Come on. Let me know, m’eudail. I can’t sleep until I find out.

Unlike Kenneth Clarke during the Budget speech. Still, he didn’t miss much that was interesting. Just that 1p cut from petrol.

You know, I don’t think etrol has quite the same ring to it.

Free clobber for Gaelic speakers

Whether you are a cove or a blone, of whatever age, would you like a free makeover? You will be kitted out in a set of new clothes chosen by fashion experts, accessories and tips for your skin and hair as well as some kind of a health activity whether it’s a massage or some other kind of workout.

You too could change

And you can keep the clothes. Good deal, eh? There must be a snag.
Just two: you have to speak Gaelic and let them film your transformation for the BBC Alba programme Grinn. They will also cough up for a slap-up meal for you and a mate who will talk about the new you.
If you, or someone you know, could do with being splogged up or could do with a few new threads, call Iain Macleod on 07789 501356.  Warning – it could change your life. I did it last year and look at me now.

Policy on comments

Some readers are unhappy that I removed comments from certain posts last night. Others have thanked me. I don’t wish to stifle debate but it’s not worth it if any contributors feel stressed by others’ comments. Exceptions are powerful people like elected representatives who are so well-paid their lives are stress-free. Besides they often cause others stress.

Rather than pick and choose where to draw the line, I removed these ones. I will moderate any further comments for a while but all comments will be published unless I am aware of a valid reason not to. I welcome feedback if you feel a comment is inappropriate.

So just who is plotting against Manford?

Peter Carlin is a councillor from South Uist who is a decent, honest fellow. Sources have strongly suggested he is working behind the scenes to oust Donald Manford as transport chairman. We already know the comhairle leadership wants to demote the Barra beardie for asking difficult questions about who was responsible for the ongoing contracts scandals which have cost you and me nearly £1 million so far.

They're "completely wrong"

So I wrote to Mr Carlin asking if he had been enlisted to help get rid of his fellow member from the deep sous for being a thorn in the side of the big chiefs. Here is his reply:

Dear Mr MacIver
Your sources are completely wrong. I won’t be commenting any further.
Leis gach deagh dhurachd
Peter Carlin

That’s all we need to know. That has absolutely clarified the matter. Even if the sources were other councillors, they are completely wrong. Fine. The voters of Uist and Barra can now rest assured that never again will any impression be given that Mr Carlin wants to oust Donald Manford. Because, if that impression is ever given again, it may not then be correct to call him a decent, honest fellow.

Meanwhile, my sources tell me that Donald John Macsween and Archie Campbell are now playing cruel party politics. Despite their well-earned socialist credentials fighting for the underdogs against powerful brutes, they are disappointingly prepared to let the bearded Sneep swing without a murmur. The leadership expects its monkeys to see no evil. If they keep schtum, people’s views about these two will change – and mine too.

Scrutinising what?

The churchy ones are in this up to their necks too, I keep hearing.  I was sure these stalwarts of the Church of Scotland and the Free Church would rush to defend freedom of speech, no matter the religion of the victim being persecuted by the leadership. Was I being naive?

Donald Nicholson is supposed to  be chairman of the Audit and Scrutiny Committee. He can’t even be bothered to reply to my email of last week to explain what he has done – if anything. And this from a council that keeps patting itself on the back for its openness and transparency and councillors who are signed up to a code of conduct which pledges them to be open and honest about all their dealings.

Tut tut. Honestly, I thought they were all nice people down at that council.

(To my blog monitor at Audit Scotland: I hope you are taking all this down. There’s more to come.)

UPDATE: To publicly answer a foul email I received today; no, I am not “now an SNP activist”.  I am, however, generally in favour of the underdog – especially when the big Rottweilers are growling at it – and, wherever possible, I will favour free speech. Both principles are under heavy attack in this sad case.

By sitting on their hands in this crucial test of who really backs fair play, I believe that, so far, most councillors have shown themselves to care little for either principle and to be sycophantic. However, they are as entitled to their ghastly, narrow views as I am to my refreshingly golden ones.

Councillor Donald Manford’s days are numbered?

My sources embedded deep in the White House have called me because they want me to know that, as I predicted, the comhairle leadership has begun moves at an informal meeting to remove Councillor Donald Manford from the chairmanship of transportation.

It’s top secret. You’re not supposed to know – so don’t tell anyone.

The mole also says there was not one councillor there – even the chairman of the Audit and Scrutiny Committee who can’t be bothered to reply to my emails asking what he has done to investigate the ongoing tendering fiascos – with courage to quiz the leadership directly on who stopped the urgent legal advice getting to the board of Sgoiltean Ura.

So the only councillor to ask difficult questions is to be demoted – with the help of a southern isles collaborator, we hear – and not one other councillor is prepared to challenge what is going on.

Democracy in action? Is this the Western Isles or a dodgy foreign dictatorship?

PS – As Audit Scotland investigators last week told the comhairle they are reading this blog with interest, I can confirm they may keep a copy of this for their records. I can name those who want alleged bad man Manford out if they care to call me. You heard it here first.

SNP “politicised” the coastguard protest

Why the SNP banners?

It looks as if some people and not just in the Labour Party were put off taking part in the rally on Saturday because the SNP decided to turn out with banners.  There is a suggestion that it was understood that such campaigns are conducted without any attempt at politicisation. The Labour Party seems to have kept to that in the other protest, which some of their people organised.

I now believe that quite a number of people decided on Saturday not to join the march under banners for a cause they do not believe in.  While the Labour Party people are saying there was no boycott, I know they were seriously fed up with what they see as the SNP politicising the event.

Another local character, who tells me he is in no political party, said: “I did not go on the march and rally because I saw it had been hijacked by the SNP.  Labour had no banners at the last protest so I expected everyone to put party politics aside for the day. No such luck with the nationalists we have here now.

“Why did they have the banners? This issue had nothing to do with local party politics. They are supposed to want the same things on this issue. Alasdair Allan shows he has no control of the rabble by not telling them to put the banners away. I think they spoiled it for a lot of people. They seemed more interested in PR for the SNP than helping the coastguards.”

Well now. This poses all kinds of other questions. From the photos, I can see the SNP banners much in evidence. They certainly deliberately politicised a local issue, it can be argued. Right, Dr Alasdair Allan, may we have your view please?

** Due to a complaint, comments have been removed. Any future comments will be moderated. **

Speakers at Stornoway coastguard rally


These are the speeches that were made at the coastguard rally on Saturday. Just click the arrow. It starts with the arrival of the pipe band and lasts 9 minutes.
You will hear council leader Angus Campbell say the key lies with the Liberal Democrats in the coalition and issue a challenge to Charles Kennedy and Michael Moore.
This is for the benefit of people who could not make it and for those leading lights of our Labour Party who, incredibly, decided to boycott the event. Their collective failure to demonstrate support has caused some offence already.
A coastguard volunteer has asked me today to find out why the previously-supportive party of the working class decided to stay away when some of them helped organise the last protest.
So I will ask the question here. Why did you stay away?

Faster ferries are needed over here, come hell or high water

Published in Press and Journal: 21/03/2011

IT WAS my first meeting about ferries at which Sunday sailings weren’t mentioned. Not even once, unless it was in that lull when I nodded off before Councillor Charlie Nicolson tore off his shirt and turned into a gallant movie superhero. More of that later. Powerful decision-makers from the CalMac group of companies and the Scottish Government were lined up in a row to tell us residents of Lewis why we didn’t need two ferries to Ullapool and to just stop going on about it.

Good news on the presentations and charts: passenger numbers are going up a few per cent each year because of the SNP’s wonderful vote-harvesting RET scheme which has seen so many abandon the other party of empty promises.

Everyone agrees we need a bigger, better ferry to cope with all that than the present tub, the motor vessel Isle of Lewis.

She has good passenger accommodation, though. She can ship 1,000 dizzy Mod-goers back to their heathery island home from host towns like Dunoon and Oban.

And she has well-positioned railings for them to lean on while emptying their stomachs into the Minch while all the time keeping time with the swaying multitude warbling Eilean Fraoich.

That’s a song about a heathery island, by the way. It is much-loved by people from a heathery island who always sing it when they leave a heathery island or return to a heathery island, especially if they’ve had a wee drink.

So what answer have the bosses of the state-owned ferry company? Well, how about . . . a single vessel that will carry just 600.

Eh? Still, she’ll probably be faster, so she will cut the sailing time and will make 10 sailings a day? Er, not quite. In fact, not at all.

The Edinburgh mandarins got their calculators out and decided 600 passengers was quite enough. The Isle of Lewis rarely has more than 400 or 500 on board, they say. Even if the number travelling goes up a few per cent each year due to the fabulous RET scheme which assured electoral victory and enduring warm hugs here for the entire SNP, it will still be big enough for 25 years.

Except at Royal National Mods, the start and finish of the trades holidays and, of course, most Sundays.

The new ferry would cost a cool £50million. She certainly will take more vehicles, but she would be only a knot or two faster. Probably 18 knots at most. May take 15 minutes off the journey at best.

That made smoke come out of Councillor Charlie’s ears. He wants a faster boat because it is something “which everyone in this community wants”. He went on and on about that.

The captain of the outfit that owns the ferries, Caledonian Maritime Assets Ltd (Clam), clammed up at that point. He saw Charlie’s eyes narrowing. He wasn’t happy. He was changing. He was not Charles Nicholson any more; he was someone else. Someone mean, moody, silent. The background music rose to a crescendo then: yes, yes, yes, Charles Nicholson was Charles Bronson in The Magnificent Seven.

Except there was only one of him.

The other councillors deserted our new hero. The few there said little – except Donald Manford, who is not really known for sitting on his hands and saying nothing.

Most councillors, it seems, could not pull themselves away from Coronation Street to attend a pointless ferries meeting, so poor Charlie was left to plead the case for a faster boat “which everyone in this community wants”, almost on his lonesome ownsome.

The Clam cove claimed fuel consumption would soar at these cross-channel and Irish ferry speeds. Costs would be eye-watering.

“You are only maws, after all,” I thought I heard him say, but maybe that was someone behind me. I’m really not sure.

We had tears in our eyes as Charlie vainly tried to fight the good fight for faster ferries. On his own. With no one with him.

The ferries fellow eventually agreed to “look again” at his proposals, but he hummed and hawed. The faster a ferry, the more fuel you need to run it and it is ever so slightly dear, you know.

Look again? Is that the best he could do? It’s going to be a no, then, Charlie.

All round the country, ferries are getting faster. Everywhere except between Ullapool and God’s own island, where we must put up with a quality of service that was provided elsewhere 50 years ago.

The Isle of Man has had SeaCats for donkeys. Its ferry company operates two of them to and from Douglas.

They chug along at 35 knots and, if necessary, can do 40 knots, although they don’t like to do that unless they have to because, according to a recent interview by their boss, it costs “a little bit more”. Not too eye-watering, then?

Companies like Condor also have fantastic ferries crossing to France. You know the ones; they look like white whales with their mouths open. Their average cruising speeds are also 38 knots. Whoosh.

If we had that speed across the Minch, we would be in Ullapool before we stood up to get that second cup of tea and bacon roll.

That’s it. That must be why CalMac is not so keen on having a faster ferry. It would mean we wouldn’t have enough time to tuck into those expensive sandwiches, those eggs and chips and that not-so-bad chicken curry that makes a voyage in an unbearably slow tub almost bearable.

Now, here’s a thing. If the unloved Labour Party was to actually get off its collective bottom, stop trying to block the Harris-to-Skye seven-day service and promise to get us a faster ferry – which we know “everyone in this community wants” – some of us would think they were worth voting for again.

Nah, that’s not going to happen, is it? Forget I said anything.

Did Labour Party boycott coastguard rally?

People have been asking why the leading lights of the Labour Party were conspicuous by their absence at the rally in Stornoway today for the coastguards.

All I can say is I did not see many either. I certainly did not see the Labour candidate or many, if any, of the local party activists. However, I was not made aware of any move by them to boycott the event nor did I hear of any other reason why they would not show solidarity with members of the threatened service.

What I did hear was several people asking where the heck they were and why there were no speeches on behalf of the party of the working class this time. The general air of discontent with Labour suggests islanders are noticing the local campaign is suffering some PR hiccups of late.

I was recording the speeches for radio. Listening back, I have inadvertently picked up one disgruntled marcher telling a mate: “If the Labour Party can’t be bothered to come out and support something like this then I’ll be ****** if I can be bothered to give them my vote.”  Oops.